Case pattern

Building a shared-services model for acquired subsidiaries.

A facilities services platform serving large retail, malls, aviation, and commercial environments needed newly acquired subsidiaries to integrate into shared invoicing, AP, purchase-order, and cash-management standards.

Strategic mandate

Translate M&A growth into shared-services discipline the business could repeatedly absorb.

Engagement leadership: Executive Lead, M&A Integration & Shared Services

Acquired subsidiaries needed to integrate into a shared-services model that could support continued M&A activity. The work focused on aligning invoicing, AP, purchase-order behavior, payment terms, payout timing, data migration, and cash-flow management into a repeatable operating approach.

M&A

Subsidiary integration

Acquired entities needed to integrate into platform standards without losing the local context required to execute.

AP

Shared services

Invoicing and accounts payable needed more consistent workflows, ownership, and execution standards.

Cash

Cash-flow control

PO behavior, invoice timing, payment terms, and AP payout timelines needed standards so cash flow could be monitored closely.

Business diagnosis

Each acquired subsidiary brought its own operating reality: customer structures, service delivery habits, billing practices, AP routines, purchasing behavior, data quality, and local team expectations. The challenge was not simply conversion. It was alignment and integration: bringing those businesses into platform standards while preserving the context needed for day-to-day execution.

Operating model design

The shared-services model needed to connect invoicing, AP, purchase-order behavior, payment terms, payout timing, data migration, process refinement, reporting expectations, role ownership, and change adoption. The goal was to create a practical bridge between acquired companies and the platform: standardize where the business needed cash-flow control, and preserve local context where it mattered for execution.

How the work created value

  • Shared-services capacity: helped build out a platform model for invoicing and AP across acquired subsidiaries.
  • Cash-flow visibility: helped establish standards around purchase-order behavior, invoice expectations, payment terms, and AP payout timelines so the business could keep a close eye on cash flow.
  • Subsidiary alignment: supported acquired businesses as they integrated into shared enterprise systems and execution standards.
  • Process consistency: helped refine local ways of working so acquired businesses could operate with more repeatable discipline.
  • Data migration confidence: worked through migration requirements, readiness questions, and the operating context behind the data.
  • Change adoption: connected system onboarding to the people, training, communication, and expectations required for teams to use the new model.
  • Scalable M&A execution: helped make acquisition integration more repeatable rather than treating every entity as a custom rescue effort.

What this looked like in practice

The work required moving between acquisition strategy and operational detail. The platform needed growth through M&A, but each acquired subsidiary brought real work: local process differences, AP and invoicing habits, purchasing behavior, data questions, system-readiness issues, and people who needed clarity on how their day-to-day work would change.

The transformation value came from making those pieces connect. Invoicing, AP, purchase orders, payment terms, payout timelines, data migration, process design, system onboarding, and change management could not be treated as separate tracks. They had to form one practical path for getting the acquired business into the shared-services operating model while giving leadership a tighter view of cash flow.

Why it mattered

The value creation was absorption capacity and cash-flow discipline. The business could grow through M&A with a better path for getting acquired subsidiaries aligned to the platform, operating through shared services, and following purchasing, invoicing, terms, and payout standards that supported spend visibility and cash management.

What it proves

This case shows the ability to connect M&A strategy to shared-services design: invoicing, AP, purchase-order standards, data migration, process maturity, system onboarding, change management, and the business discipline required to make acquired subsidiaries part of a scalable platform.

Back to selected work